data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faddf/faddfeee0c8c851f5f376cb79024433387ef620d" alt=""
But I digress.
Ingo's oeuvre is totally about 3 simple things; the canvas (linen), paint straight from the tube, and simple brush strokes. His unstretched and unframed canvases are cut about the size of a pillowcase and primed with transparent acrylic medium. (And eventually Velcroed to the walls.) He then loads his brush, which is about a fifth as wide as the canvas, with dollops of oil paint straight from the tube and proceeds to make his simple strokes, which are usually spare. The names of the paints become the titles of the paintings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30617/306178623ee4efff9326d84ca358d27d0bd579c2" alt=""
Personally, I've always had this "thing" for the names of paint. I'd much prefer to pick a paint (to buy or apply) solely on the merits of it's name and how it sounded or affected my emotions. There's many a painting where each of the colors used, were chosen because of the description or name on the tube. So for this particular aspect of his oeuvre, he's my hero. Actually I admire his whole train of thought; the way he's completely separated and respected the three basic components of painting. It's like he's giving equal respect to these elements by keeping it all to a very factual minimum.
.
The two images are from Galerie Nordenhake, where you'll find more images and info.
.
For seven other images of his work, go to Cheim & Read.
.
And for a lovely automatic slide show of a few of his works and a shot of his studio with the paints all lined up, go here.
No comments:
Post a Comment